Original Article

 

Comparison of Recurrence after Pterygium Excision with Amniotic Membrane Graft Versus Stem Cell Graft

 

Nukhba Zahid, Irfan Qayyum, Ayesha Hanif

 

Pak J Ophthalmol 2018, Vol. 34, No. 1

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . .

See end of article for

authors affiliations

 

…..………………………..

 

Correspondence to:

Dr. Nukhba Zahid

DHQ Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala

Email: nukhba.zahid@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purpose: To compare the recurrence of pterygium with amniotic membrane versus stem cell graft techniques after pterygium excision.

Study Design: Quasi experimental study.

Place and Duration of Study: Study was conducted at DHQ Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala, for duration of 12 Months from July 2016 - June 2017.

Material and Methods: This was a quasi experimental study where two surgical procedures were opted for pterygium excision. The patients were divided into two equal groups. One group had pterygium excision with stem cells grafting and the other group had pterygium excision with amniotic membrane grafting. Patients of both gender, above 18 years of age with grade 2-3 of pterygium causing discomfort, visual impairment or cosmetic disfigurement were included in the study. Whereas patients with id abnormalities, lacrimal sac infection, dry eye syndrome, pseudo pterygium and patients with recurrent epithelial erosions were excluded from the study

Results: Out of 60 patients, 38 (63.3%) were males and 22 (36.7%) were females in this study. The mean age was 42 ± 9.3 years. Recurrence rate with amniotic membrane grafting was 10 % and with stem cell grafting it was 3.3%.  

Conclusion: Stem cell grafting has less recurrence and better cosmetic appearance than amniotic membrane graft.

Key words: Amniotic membrane graft, Pseudo pterygium, surgical procedures, stem cell graft.

 


Pterygium is a fibrovascular conjunctival tissue, which invades the cornea1. It is three sided in shape and is more often located nasally than temporally2. The most common clinical symptoms of pterygium are ocular irritation, hyperemia and vision loss3. Conjunctival or limbal auto grafts, amniotic membrane grafts, application of Mitomycin C, post-operative beta irradiation, postoperative Thiotepa application, buccal mucus membrane grafting etc. are major adjuvants for prevention of pterygium recurrence4-10.

Although many other therapeutic modalities have been proposed8,11,12, further studies on their efficacy and safety are required. The purpose of this study was to compare the recurrence of pterygium with amniotic membrane versus stem cell graft techniques after pterygium excision. Also, the efficacy and outcomes of pterygium excision were also considered postoperatively.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a quasi experimental study where two surgical procedures were opted for pterygium excision for two groups of patients. Each group comprised of 30 patients. Patients were randomly divided in two groups by using random number table. The treatment modality in Group A was pterygium excision with amniotic membrane grafting whereas in group B it was stem cell grafting. The venue of this study was DHQ University teaching hospital, Gujranwala. The duration of the study was twelve months starting from July 2016. The patients were selected through non-probability, purposive sampling method. Patients of both gender, above 18 years of age with grade 2 - 3 of pterygium causing discomfort, visual impairment or disfigurement were included in the study. Approval from ethical committee of hospital was taken. Demographic and clinical characteristics were noted for each patient. An informed consent was taken from each patient in which the purpose and procedure was explained and confidentiality of information was ensured.

Both the procedures were done under sub-conjunctival anesthesia. A 0.5 cc injection xylocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline was given into the head of the lesion.  The pterygium mass along with overlying conjunctiva was excised.

In Group A, amniotic membrane grafting was done. The membrane was taken from human placenta after Hep B, Hep C and HIV screening. It was then soaked in antibiotics (gentamycin and fluconazole) for about 1 hour. After taking measurement of the bare sclera with calipers, a graft of the same size was sutured with 10/0 nylon.

In Group B, after excision of the ptergyium bare area was measured with calipers. Then conjunctival stem cell autograft was taken from the superior limbus and stitched to the bare area at the limbus.

At the end of the procedure, a combination of topical steroid and antibiotic drops were prescribed and an eye pad was applied for 72 hours. These drops were used four times a day for 1 month and then tapered off. Follow up was done after 3 days, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post operatively for pterygium recurrence (fibro-vascular re-growth crossing limbus by 1 mm or more).

All the collected data was stored electronically & analyzed later by using SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistics were applied to calculate mean and standard deviation. Frequency distribution and percentages were calculated for qualitative variables like gender, level 2 and 3 pterygium. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

RESULTS

The mean age was 42 ± 9.3 years. There were 38(63.3%) males and 22 (36.7%) females in this study. The size of pterygium invasion outside limbus ranged from 2 - 4 mm. The distribution of pterygium grades among groups is given in table 1.

 

Table 1: Pterygium grades distribution among groups.

 

Pterygium Grades

Group A

Group B

Grade 2

15 (50%)

12 (40%)

Grade 3

15 (50%)

18 (60%)

 

All the patients were operated with their allotted surgical treatment and observed postoperatively. Corneal epithelial defects were observed in almost all patients, which healed after one week of operation. No corneal staining with fluorescein was observed in any group, although few complaints like foreign body sensation and watering were seen in some patients of group A & B. None of the patients had grafting edema in group A which was operated with amniotic membrane graft whereas 4 (13.3%) patients had edema in group B which was operated with stem cell graft. The difference between both groups was insignificant (p > 0.05) for all complications. The details of other postoperative complications are given in figure 1. In our study, recurrence rate was 10% with amniotic membrane grafting while recurrence rate of 3.3% was seen with stem cell graft. (p > 0.05).

 

 

Fig. 1: Postoperative complication of both groups.

 

DISCUSSION

It is well known that pterygium is a multifactorial disorder, which is degenerative in nature13-15. The excision of the pterygium has complications and recurrence, which is more difficult to control. The underlying recurrence mechanism had been attributed to trauma, inflammation, and proliferation of fibroblasts and deposition of extracellular matrix16-19. In our study, we selected 60 patients with pterygium and divided them into two groups of 30 patients each. The age range in the study was 18 to 58 years. The mean age was 42 ± 9.3 years. Maximum patients (65%) presented between ages 34 - 49 years. Among all the patients 38 (63.3%) were males and 22 (36.67%) were females. Among 38 male patients, 19 were treated by pterygium excision with amniotic membrane grafting and other 19 by pterygium excision with stem cell grafting. Female patients were 11 in each group. The recurrence rate following pterygium excision with amniotic membrane graft was found to be 10% and with stem cell graft it was 3%. Among 19 male patients in group A, 2 had recurrence whereas in group B, 1 patient had recurrence while no recurrence was noted in female patients. Recurrence was noted in patients between 39 - 45 years of age. Other published studies support our findings13-15. One of the researches claimed a recurrence rate of 27%, which is comparatively very high. The study findings of Nakamura et al16 recorded no recurrence in follow up period. Moreover, some vision threatening side effects such as scleral ulceration, cataract formation and glaucoma have been reported20. In literature many researchers have provided evidence of its functional importance20. It is also well known that the conjunctiva and the limbus are important in maintenance and integrity of the corneal epithelium21. The current study presents only minor postoperative complications like hemorrhage and graft edema. These results are supported by various available published studies15,22. Compared with the bare sclera method, conjunctival autograft is a more technically demanding procedure. Surgeon factors (experience, technique, etc) may have a profound influence on the recurrence rate. Moreover, conjunctival grafts including limbus generally yield better results, because in addition to the contact inhibition effect on residual abnormal tissue by conjunctival graft, the former may also contain limbal stem cells which help to restore the limbal barrier, and this in turn inhibits pterygium recurrence and retards recurrence time20,23,24. Soliman and Bhattia reported that there were no recurrences of pterygium growth except in 2 cases (4.75%) following stem cell graft with pterygium excision25. The limitation of the study is the small sample size and larger study is needed to assess the safety profile and low recurrence rate of pterygium excision.

 

CONCLUSION

No major postoperative complications following stem cell graft with pterygium excision were seen in our study. Based on results of our study we recommend that stem cell grafting gives less recurrence and better cosmetic appearance than amniotic membrane graft.

 

Author’s Affiliation

Dr. Nukhba Zahid

Medical Officer

MBBS

Ophthalmology department

DHQ Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala.

 

Dr. Irfan Qayyum

Associated Professor

MBBS, FCPS, FVR

Ophthalmology department

DHQ Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala.

 

Dr. Ayesha Hanif

Medical Officer

MBBS

Ophthalmology department

DHQ Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala.

 

Role of Authors

Dr. Nukhba Zahid

Study design, manuscript writing & surgeon.

 

Dr. Irfan Qayyum

Manuscript review and critical analysis.

 

Dr. Ayesha Hanif

Data Collection and surgeon.

 

REFERENCES

1.        American Academy of Ophthalmology. Basic and Clinical Science Course. Section 8, External disease and cornea. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2004: 344.

2.        Khamar B, Khamar M, Trivedi N. Degenerative conditions of the conjunctiva. In: Dutta LC, Dutta NK, eds. Modern Ophthalmology, 3rd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee. 2005: 127-30.

3.        Gupta V, Tandon R, Vajpayee RB. Disorders of conjunctiva. In: Agarwal S, Agarwal A, Apple DJ, Burato L, Alio JL, Panday SK, eds. Textbook of ophthalmology, Vol-2. Lids, adnexa and orbit external eye diseases, cornea and refractive surgery. 1sted. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers, 2002: 862-9.

4.        Okoye O, NC Oguego, Chukaokosa C M, Ghanta M. Short term results of pterygium surgery with adjunctive amniotic membrane graft. Niger J Clin Pract. 2013; 16: 356-9.

5.        Hussain A Alhammami. Amniotic membrane transplantation for primary pterygium surgery, Med J Babylon. 2012;  9 (4): 734-738.

6.        Sangwan VS, Burman S, Tejaswani S, Mahesh SP, Murthy R. Amniotic membrane transplantation, A Review of current Indications in management of ophthalmic disorders, Indian J Ophthal 2007; 55: 251-60.

7.        Zhao F, et al. clinical observation on fresh amniotic membrane transplantation for treatment of recurrent pterygium, article in Chinese, 2002; 18 (4); 220-2.

8.        Goldberg L, David R. Pterygium and its relationship to the dry eye in Bantu.Br J Ophthalmol. 1976; 60: 720-1.

9.        Alemworie M, Abebe B, Menen A. Prevalence of pterygium in a rural community of Meskan District, Southern Ethiopia. Ethio J Health Dev. 2008; 22: 1914.

10.     Asokan R, Venkatasubbu RS, Velumuri L, Lingam V, George R. Prevalence and associated factors for pterygium and pingencula in South Indian Population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012; 32: 3944.

11.     Hirst LW. The treatment of pterygium. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003; 48: 145-77.

12.     Fernandes M, Sangwan VS, Gangopadhyay N, Sridhar MS, Garg P, Aasuri MK, et al. Outcome of pterygium surgery: analysis over 14 years. Eye, 2005; 19: 118290.

13.     Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altinors DD. Comparison of conjunctival autograft with amniotic membrane transplantation for pterygium surgery: Surgical and cosmetic outcome. Cornea, 2007; 26: 407.

14.     Allan BD, Short P, Crawford GJ, Barret GD, Constable IJ. Pterygium excision with conjunctival autografting: An effective and safe technique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993; 77: 698701.

15.     Luanratanakorn P, Ratanapakrm T, SuwanApichon D, Chuck RS. Randomised controlled study of conjunctival autogaft versus amniotic membrane graft in pterygium excision. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90: 147680.

16.     Nakamura T, Inatomi T, Sekiyama C, Ang LP, Yokoi N, Kinoshita S. Clinical application of sterilized freezedried amniotic membrane to treat patients with pterygium. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006; 84: 4015.

17.     Ma DH, See LC, Liau SB, Tsai RJ. Amniotic membrane graft for pterygium. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84: 9738.

18.     Mastropasqua L, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Enrico Gallenga P. Long term results of intraoperative mitomycin C in the treatment of recurrent pterygium. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80: 28891.

19.     Buratto L, Phillips R L, Carito G. Pterygium surgery. NJ: SLACK: Slack Incorporated; 2000.

20.     Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Burkett G. Comparison of conjunctival autograft, amniotic membrane grafts, and primary closure for pterygium excision. Ophthalmology, 1997; 104: 974-85.

21.     BaradaranRafii AR, Aghayan HR, Arjmand B, Javadi MA. Amniotic membrane transplantation. Iran J Ophthalmic Res. 2007; 2: 5875.

22.     Essex RW, Snibson GR, Daniell M, Tote DM. Amniotic membrane grafting in the surgical management of primary pterygium. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2004; 32: 14.

23.     Riordan-Eva P, Kielhorn I, Ficker LA, et al. Conjunctival autografting in the surgical management of pterygium. Eye, 1993; 7: 634–8.

24.     Rao SK, Lekha T, Sitalakshmi G, et al. Conjunctival autograft for pterygium surgery: how well does it prevent recurrence? Ophthalmic Surg Lasers, 1997; 28: 875–6.

25.     Soliman Mahdy MA, Bhatia J. Treatment of primary pterygium: role of limbal stem cells and conjunctival autograft transplantation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009; 19 (5): 729-32.