Original Article
Comparison
of Recurrence after Pterygium Excision with Amniotic Membrane Graft Versus Stem
Cell Graft
Nukhba Zahid, Irfan Qayyum, Ayesha Hanif
Pak J Ophthalmol 2018, Vol. 34, No.
1
. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
See end of article for authors affiliations
..
.. Correspondence to: Dr.
Nukhba Zahid DHQ
Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala Email: nukhba.zahid@gmail.com |
Purpose: To
compare the recurrence of pterygium with amniotic membrane versus stem cell
graft techniques after pterygium excision. Study
Design: Quasi experimental study. Place
and Duration of Study: Study was conducted at DHQ Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala, for
duration of 12 Months from July 2016 - June 2017. Material
and Methods: This was a quasi experimental study where
two surgical procedures were opted for pterygium excision. The patients were
divided into two equal groups. One group had pterygium excision with stem
cells grafting and the other group had pterygium excision with amniotic
membrane grafting. Patients of both gender, above 18 years of age with grade
2-3 of pterygium causing discomfort, visual impairment or cosmetic
disfigurement were included in the study. Whereas patients with id
abnormalities, lacrimal sac infection, dry eye syndrome, pseudo pterygium and
patients with recurrent epithelial erosions were excluded from the study Results:
Out of 60 patients, 38 (63.3%) were males and 22 (36.7%) were
females in this study. The mean age was 42 ± 9.3 years. Recurrence rate with amniotic membrane grafting was
10 % and with stem cell grafting it was 3.3%. Conclusion:
Stem cell grafting has less
recurrence and better cosmetic appearance than amniotic membrane graft. Key words: Amniotic membrane graft, Pseudo pterygium, surgical procedures,
stem cell graft. |
Pterygium is a fibrovascular conjunctival tissue, which invades
the cornea1. It is three sided in shape and is more often located
nasally than temporally2. The most common clinical symptoms of
pterygium are ocular irritation, hyperemia and vision loss3. Conjunctival
or limbal auto grafts, amniotic membrane grafts, application of Mitomycin C, post-operative
beta irradiation, postoperative Thiotepa application, buccal mucus membrane
grafting etc. are major adjuvants for prevention of pterygium recurrence4-10.
Although
many other therapeutic modalities have been proposed8,11,12, further
studies on their efficacy and safety are required. The purpose of this study was
to compare the recurrence of pterygium with amniotic membrane versus stem cell
graft techniques after pterygium excision. Also, the efficacy and outcomes of
pterygium excision were also considered postoperatively.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This was a quasi experimental study where
two surgical procedures were opted for pterygium excision for two groups of
patients. Each group comprised of 30 patients. Patients were randomly divided
in two groups by using random number table. The treatment modality in Group A
was pterygium excision with amniotic membrane grafting whereas in group B it
was stem cell grafting. The venue of this study was DHQ University teaching
hospital, Gujranwala. The duration of the study was twelve months starting from
July 2016. The patients were selected through non-probability, purposive
sampling method. Patients of both gender, above 18 years of age with grade 2 - 3
of pterygium causing discomfort, visual impairment or disfigurement were
included in the study. Approval from ethical committee of hospital was taken.
Demographic and clinical characteristics were noted for each patient. An informed
consent was taken from each patient in which the purpose and procedure was
explained and confidentiality of information was ensured.
Both the procedures were done under sub-conjunctival anesthesia. A
0.5 cc injection xylocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline was given into the head of
the lesion. The pterygium mass along
with overlying conjunctiva was excised.
In Group A, amniotic membrane grafting was done. The membrane was
taken from human placenta after Hep B, Hep C and HIV screening. It was then
soaked in antibiotics (gentamycin and fluconazole) for about 1 hour. After
taking measurement of the bare sclera with calipers, a graft of the same size
was sutured with 10/0 nylon.
In Group B, after excision of the ptergyium bare area was measured
with calipers. Then conjunctival stem cell autograft was taken from the superior
limbus and stitched to the bare area at the limbus.
At the end of the procedure, a combination of topical steroid and
antibiotic drops were prescribed and an eye pad was applied for 72 hours. These
drops were used four times a day for 1 month and then tapered off. Follow up
was done after 3 days, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post operatively
for pterygium recurrence (fibro-vascular re-growth crossing limbus by 1 mm or
more).
All the
collected data was stored electronically & analyzed later by using SPSS
version 20. Descriptive statistics were applied to calculate mean and standard
deviation. Frequency distribution and percentages were calculated for
qualitative variables like gender, level 2 and 3 pterygium. P value less than
0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
The
mean age was 42 ± 9.3
years. There were 38(63.3%) males and 22 (36.7%) females in this study. The size
of pterygium invasion outside limbus ranged from 2 - 4 mm. The distribution of
pterygium grades among groups is given in table 1.
Table 1: Pterygium grades distribution among groups.
Pterygium Grades |
Group A |
Group B |
Grade 2 |
15 (50%) |
12 (40%) |
Grade 3 |
15 (50%) |
18 (60%) |
All the
patients were operated with their allotted surgical treatment and observed
postoperatively. Corneal epithelial defects were observed in almost all
patients, which healed after one week of operation. No corneal staining with
fluorescein was observed in any group, although few complaints like foreign
body sensation and watering were seen in some patients of group A & B. None
of the patients had grafting edema in group A which was operated with amniotic
membrane graft whereas 4 (13.3%) patients had edema in group B which was
operated with stem cell graft. The difference between both groups was
insignificant (p > 0.05) for all complications. The details of other
postoperative complications are given in figure 1. In our study, recurrence
rate was 10% with amniotic membrane grafting while recurrence rate of 3.3% was
seen with stem cell graft. (p > 0.05).
Fig. 1: Postoperative complication of
both groups.
DISCUSSION
It is
well known that pterygium is a multifactorial disorder, which is degenerative
in nature13-15. The excision of the pterygium has complications and
recurrence, which is more difficult to control. The underlying recurrence
mechanism had been attributed to trauma, inflammation, and proliferation of fibroblasts and deposition
of extracellular matrix16-19. In our study, we selected 60
patients with pterygium and divided them into two
groups of 30 patients each. The age range in the study was 18 to 58 years. The
mean age was 42 ± 9.3 years.
Maximum patients (65%) presented between ages 34 - 49 years. Among all the
patients 38 (63.3%) were males and 22 (36.67%) were females. Among 38 male patients, 19
were treated by pterygium excision with amniotic membrane grafting and other 19
by pterygium excision with stem cell grafting. Female patients were 11 in each
group. The recurrence rate following pterygium excision
with amniotic membrane graft was found to be 10% and with stem cell graft it
was 3%. Among 19 male patients in group A, 2 had recurrence whereas in group B,
1 patient had recurrence while no recurrence was noted in female patients.
Recurrence was noted in patients between 39 - 45 years of age. Other published
studies support our findings13-15. One of the researches claimed a
recurrence rate of 27%, which is comparatively very high. The study findings of
Nakamura et al16
recorded no recurrence in follow up period. Moreover,
some vision threatening side effects such as scleral ulceration, cataract
formation and glaucoma have been reported20. In literature many
researchers have provided evidence of its functional importance20. It
is also well known that the conjunctiva and the limbus are important in maintenance
and integrity of the corneal epithelium21. The current study
presents only minor postoperative complications like hemorrhage and graft edema.
These results are supported by various available published studies15,22.
Compared with the bare sclera method, conjunctival autograft is a more
technically demanding procedure. Surgeon factors (experience, technique, etc)
may have a profound influence on the recurrence rate. Moreover, conjunctival
grafts including limbus generally yield better results, because in addition to
the contact inhibition effect on residual abnormal tissue by conjunctival
graft, the former may also contain limbal stem cells which help to restore the
limbal barrier, and this in turn inhibits pterygium recurrence and retards
recurrence time20,23,24. Soliman and Bhattia reported that there
were no recurrences of pterygium growth except in 2 cases (4.75%) following
stem cell graft with pterygium excision25. The limitation of the
study is the small sample size and larger study is needed to assess the safety
profile and low recurrence rate of pterygium excision.
CONCLUSION
No
major post‐operative
complications following stem cell graft with pterygium excision were seen in our
study. Based on results of our study we recommend that stem cell grafting gives
less recurrence and better cosmetic appearance than amniotic membrane graft.
Authors Affiliation
Dr. Nukhba Zahid
Medical Officer
MBBS
Ophthalmology department
DHQ Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala.
Dr. Irfan Qayyum
Associated Professor
MBBS, FCPS, FVR
Ophthalmology department
DHQ Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala.
Dr. Ayesha Hanif
Medical Officer
MBBS
Ophthalmology department
DHQ Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala.
Role of Authors
Dr. Nukhba Zahid
Study design, manuscript writing & surgeon.
Dr. Irfan Qayyum
Manuscript review and critical analysis.
Dr. Ayesha Hanif
Data Collection and surgeon.
REFERENCES
1.
American
Academy of Ophthalmology. Basic and Clinical Science Course. Section 8,
External disease and cornea. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology,
2004: 344.
2.
Khamar B, Khamar M, Trivedi N. Degenerative conditions of the conjunctiva. In: Dutta LC, Dutta
NK, eds. Modern Ophthalmology, 3rd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee. 2005: 127-30.
3.
Gupta V, Tandon R, Vajpayee RB. Disorders of conjunctiva. In: Agarwal S, Agarwal A, Apple DJ,
Burato L, Alio JL, Panday SK, eds. Textbook of ophthalmology, Vol-2. Lids,
adnexa and orbit external eye diseases, cornea and refractive surgery. 1sted.
New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers, 2002: 862-9.
4.
Okoye O, NC Oguego, Chukaokosa C M, Ghanta M. Short term results of pterygium surgery with adjunctive amniotic
membrane graft. Niger J Clin Pract. 2013; 16: 356-9.
5.
Hussain A Alhammami.
Amniotic membrane transplantation for primary pterygium surgery, Med J Babylon.
2012; 9 (4): 734-738.
6.
Sangwan VS, Burman S, Tejaswani S, Mahesh SP, Murthy R. Amniotic membrane transplantation, A Review of current Indications
in management of ophthalmic disorders, Indian J Ophthal 2007; 55: 251-60.
7.
Zhao F, et al. clinical
observation on fresh amniotic membrane transplantation for treatment of
recurrent pterygium, article in Chinese, 2002; 18 (4); 220-2.
8.
Goldberg L, David R.
Pterygium and its relationship to the dry eye in Bantu.Br J Ophthalmol. 1976; 60:
720-1.
9.
Alemworie M, Abebe B, Menen A. Prevalence of pterygium in a
rural community of Meskan District, Southern Ethiopia. Ethio J Health Dev.
2008; 22: 191‐4.
10.
Asokan R, Venkatasubbu RS,
Velumuri L, Lingam V, George R. Prevalence and associated factors for pterygium and
pingencula in
South Indian Population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012;
32: 3944.
11.
Hirst LW. The treatment of pterygium.
Surv Ophthalmol. 2003; 48: 145-77.
12.
Fernandes M, Sangwan VS,
Gangopadhyay N, Sridhar MS, Garg P, Aasuri MK, et al. Outcome of pterygium surgery:
analysis over 14 years. Eye, 2005; 19: 1182‐90.
13.
Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA,
Altinors DD. Comparison of conjunctival autograft with amniotic membrane
transplantation for
pterygium surgery: Surgical and cosmetic outcome.
Cornea, 2007; 26: 407.
14.
Allan BD, Short P, Crawford
GJ, Barret GD, Constable IJ. Pterygium excision with conjunctival autografting: An
effective and safe
technique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993; 77: 698‐701.
15.
Luanratanakorn P, Ratanapakrm
T, Suwan‐Apichon D, Chuck RS. Randomised controlled study
of conjunctival autogaft versus
amniotic membrane graft in
pterygium excision. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90: 1476‐80.
16.
Nakamura T, Inatomi T,
Sekiyama C, Ang LP, Yokoi N, Kinoshita S. Clinical application of
sterilized freeze‐dried amniotic
membrane to treat patients with pterygium. Acta Ophthalmol Scand
2006; 84: 401‐5.
17.
Ma DH, See LC, Liau SB, Tsai
RJ. Amniotic membrane graft for pterygium. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84:
973‐8.
18.
Mastropasqua L, Carpineto P,
Ciancaglini M, Enrico Gallenga P. Long term results of intraoperative mitomycin C in
the treatment
of recurrent pterygium. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80: 288‐91.
19.
Buratto L, Phillips R L,
Carito G. Pterygium surgery. NJ: SLACK: Slack Incorporated; 2000.
20.
Prabhasawat P, Barton K,
Burkett G. Comparison of conjunctival autograft, amniotic membrane grafts,
and primary closure for
pterygium excision. Ophthalmology,
1997; 104: 974-85.
21.
Baradaran‐Rafii AR, Aghayan HR, Arjmand B, Javadi MA. Amniotic membrane
transplantation. Iran J Ophthalmic Res. 2007; 2: 58‐75.
22.
Essex RW, Snibson GR, Daniell
M, Tote DM. Amniotic membrane grafting in the surgical management of primary
pterygium. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2004; 32: 1‐4.
23.
Riordan-Eva P, Kielhorn I,
Ficker LA, et al. Conjunctival autografting in the surgical management of
pterygium. Eye, 1993; 7: 6348.
24.
Rao SK, Lekha T, Sitalakshmi
G, et al. Conjunctival autograft for pterygium surgery: how well does it
prevent recurrence? Ophthalmic Surg Lasers, 1997; 28: 8756.
25.
Soliman Mahdy MA, Bhatia J. Treatment of primary
pterygium: role of limbal stem cells and conjunctival autograft
transplantation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009; 19 (5): 729-32.